AVR For PIC People, Part 1: The Basics

The Hex File

One thing you learn pretty quickly when dealing with device programmers is that they tend to like their input in a very specific format — and ELF is generally not it.  If you try to use one, either your programmer will complain, or the chip won’t run.  So how do we fix that?

By doing this:

$ avr-objcopy -j .text -j .data -O ihex main.elf tiny13demo.hex

This command takes the elf file and turns it into an Intel Hex file that most programmers are able to read.  The -j .text and -j .data options tell it to only copy code and data (the code segment is called .text by gcc).  The -O ihex option makes it output in Intel Hex (Motorola S-Record is also supported, along with raw binary).  Then the source file, and finally the target file.

The Statistics

Now you have the hex file you need for programming, but will it fit in your chosen chip?  There’s a simple way to find out:

$ avr-size --format=avr --mcu=attiny13a main.elf

This will give you output similar to the following:

AVR Memory Usage
----------------
Device: attiny13a

Program:      68 bytes (6.6% Full)
(.text + .data + .bootloader)

Data:          0 bytes (0.0% Full)
(.data + .bss + .noinit)

USEFUL TIP:  Make sure you use the ELF binary as input to this command!  Pointing at the HEX file will result in bizarre, erroneous behavior.  It doesn’t understand those files!

About Steve

When it comes to the desktop, Steve is a former Amiga, Windows, and Linux user, and as of six years ago, a die-hard Mac head (who, for once, isn't thinking of changing platforms again any time soon). When it comes to the server, Linux is pretty much the only game he plays. He also enjoys hardware hacking, and shouldn't be allowed near a keyboard after the sun sets (or for that matter, after it rises. Don't say I didn't warn you).
This entry was posted in AVR, Hardware Hacking. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to AVR For PIC People, Part 1: The Basics

  1. Daniel says:

    Thanks for this! I’ve been using microchip’s PICs a fair amount, and wanted to start trying AVRs to see if they might be more simple. This will be a nice starting point.

  2. Steve says:

    Um. This is a serious cliffhanger – or did Part2 get blown with the wind^Wfuse? Is there still hope?
    Thanks anyway for the nice introduction, as a late adopter I appreciate it a lot. Everyone else is using RasPis now, but AVRs are fun for someone who decades ago had to learn and write (mainframe) assembly code!

Comments are closed.